Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott just told the Star-Telegram that the Texas Department of Transportation "is trying to get around the constitution" by refusing to change contract language for the North Tarrant Express project.
North Tarrant Express includes the expansion of Loop 820, Texas 121/183 and eventually Interstate 35W. But in a phone interview a few minutes ago, Abbott said the conduct of transportation department lawyers is "clearly putting the contract in danger."
The key problem is, the transportation department is refusing to insert language in a 52-year agreement with the private developer that makes it clear state funds are subject to appropriation every two years by the Legislature.
The developer is NTE Mobility Partners, a team led by the U.S. arm of Madrid-based Cintra.
The same dispute between the AG and transportation department likely will come up when it comes time to review the LBJ Managed Lanes project in Dallas.
In Tarrant County, the North Tarrant Express is a whopping project totaling nearly $2 billion. It represents freeway work that has been needed for two decades, but that the transportation department alone could not afford.
So, after a lengthy bidding process that ended in January, Cintra and the other members of NTE Mobility Partners agreed to put up $300 million in equity and $1.1 billion in debt (including federal and bank loans and private activity bonds), in return for the right to build the North Tarrant Express project and collect tolls on proposed new express lanes for 52 years.
In return, the transportation department would contribute $570 million in public funds to the project.
But the Texas Constitution doesn't allow the transportation department to make that commitment, Abbott said. While some of those dollars are in hand, the bulk of that money would have to come in future years, based upon appropriations from future legislators, he said.
"We have told TxDot what they had to do in these contracts in order to get them to comply with the Texas Constitution," Abbott said. "For about a month now, TxDot lawyers have repeatedly come back to our office with angles and attempts to get around the constitution. At first we thought they didn't understand the constitution. Then we thought they were trying to play games. Now we can't understand what they're doing. Their conduct is clearly putting the contract in danger. Their conduct has been inappropriate."
The delays could lead to yet another postponement of the proposed expansion of Northeast Loop 820 in North Richland Hills and Haltom City, Texas 121/183 in Bedford and Hurst and eventually I-35W in north Fort Worth. Or, at the very least, it could lead to financial penalties that cost Tarrant County some of its highway funds. When the transportation department and developer reached a conditional agreement in late January, they predicted the attorney general's review would take 60 days.
Instead, nearly 150 days later, the two sides have had to extend the agreement to avoid having financial penalties kick in.
Transportation department officials declined to elaborate on the status of the agreement, except to say that they're making progress. Maribel Chavez, the department's Fort Worth district engineer, disputed the assertion that the project is being "held up."
"The Attorney General is required to do a thorough review and thorough analysis," she said. "It won't be concluded until we address whatever questions they have."
Business leaders along the I-35W corridor are flabbergasted that the long-awaited project is enduring yet another delay.
"Where has everybody been the last six years? For it to get all the way to the goal line, and the attorneys for all parties to not resolve this, is shocking," said Mike Berry, president of Hillwood Properties. The company is developing the Alliance Airport-area, and considers I-35W its backbone and main transportation connection to the outside world. "It's a fundamental premise of a business deal. They've been talking about it for six years, yet went ahead and awarded a concession and executed a contract and now they're saying they don't have language the parties can live with and the attorney general can bless?"
-- Gordon Dickson


I do not agree that we are in a "dispute" when it comes to our interactions with the Attorney General. The contract is to be negotiated between the developer and the state, and the legal sufficiency discussions between TxDOT and OAG are a part of that process. We are working to address their concerns with the contract, and we are confident that we can achieve a consensus on the unresolved matters. We are doing everything we can to address their concerns, and we are confident that this project will move forward.
Posted by: Chris Lippincott, TxDOT | June 11, 2009 at 05:35 PM
Sorry Greg but I don't agree with selling our highway systems off to come company in Spain. If our legislators would use our tax money for highways like it's intended for then we could afford to build new roads. I may talk slow but I'm not stupid.
Posted by: Tex | June 11, 2009 at 08:35 PM
re post by Greg Lippincott;
I am thankful that the Attorney General is looking our for the best interests of the citizens. It is clear that leaders in TXDOT and Perry have been bought and paid for by CINTRA and ignoring what the citizens have said all along about foreign companies.
There is a reason 6 out of 10 Texans voted against Perry, perhaps TXDOT ought to get a clue.
Posted by: Marvin Williams | June 11, 2009 at 09:06 PM
Raise the gas tax, you cowards. Fifteen cents a gallon is cheaper than 15 cents a mile, especially for 52 years.
Quit selling us out to Cintra and Perry's fellow loser Aggies, HB Zachry.
Posted by: Mark D | June 11, 2009 at 09:10 PM
We don't want to be like Florida! It seems like every highway over there has a toll road.
We have the Texas Constitution for a reason. No Cintra! Just another way for us to get taxed. I can see the "Texas Tea Party" movement gaining momentum now...
Posted by: Kim | June 11, 2009 at 10:19 PM
These roads they are wanting to extend 820 + 35 are part of the federal interstate system. They are in no way privately funded and should by no means be toll roads How can we as a state allow a foreign company to come in here and build and run roads that were put in place by President Eisenhower
Posted by: george | June 14, 2009 at 11:24 PM
With all the new Federal funds available for roads why are we relying on Foreign companies. I'd rather pay myself back!
Posted by: Jan Young | June 15, 2009 at 11:13 PM
This second item begs the question of whether or not you (my readers) want to hear about awards, medals, etc. that New York wineries win. Sometimes it seems that most everyone wins something somasfdewhere at some point, so I tend to not focus on them, BUT, if you tell me you want to know, I'll be happy to post results more often.
Posted by: cheap jordans canada | July 13, 2011 at 08:47 PM