Thursday’s shooting on a Texas military base has revived the debate on whether the current gun control rules on military bases make sense and both advocates and critics see the tragedy as supporting their side.
Army Chief of Staff George W. Casey Jr. ordered a review of all force protection policies at U.S. Army bases worldwide Thursday, including the rules regarding who can carry guns on the bases.
Currently, concealed handgun laws such as the one in Texas do not apply on military bases. Soldiers generally only carry weapons on base when there is a specific reason. Personal weapons are registered with authorities on the base and stored in special rooms until they are signed out.
Suzanna Hupp, a former state representative whose parents were among the Killeen Luby’s massacre victims in 1991, said allowing soldiers on base to carry arms would not prevent attacks like Thursday's, but would likely reduce the damage.
"Of course the element of surprise was a probably valuable tool for a creep like this," Hupp said. "You’re not going to prevent somebody from killing those first couple of people...but after that...if more people were armed in there, it could have ended much, much, much sooner."
Texas Land Commissioner Jerry Patterson, a gun rights advocate, said the policies at military bases should be up to military officials, but a review of Fort Hood’s policies makes sense.
“I’m not saying the policy should change ... but again we have an example of a shooter going to a target rich environment where he knew that no one was there who could resist,” he said.
Several gun control groups quickly pointed to the Fort Hood tragedy as a reason to stiffen gun control laws.
“This latest tragedy, at a heavily fortified army base, ought to convince more Americans to reject the argument that the solution to gun violence is to arm more people with more guns in more places,” said Paul Helmke, President of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. “Enough is enough.”
US Rep. Kay Granger, R-Fort Worth, said Congress may need to look closely at this issue but shouldn't until the Army completes its review.
“This base, and other bases, these are people’s homes,” Granger said. “So there are people who are armed on base – military police, security guards – but not in their homes, their schools, or in this case the deployment area.”
-Aman Batheja and Anna Tinsley