Last spring, the Texas Legislature had to decide what to do about the Texas primary.
All sides were in agreement that the election calendar had to be tweaked in some way to allow the state to comply with a new federal law requiring military and overseas voters have more time to vote.
The leading options were to move the primary to early April or keep the primary in early March and move other key deadlines around it. State Rep. Van Taylor, R-Plano, argued that moving the primary to April was the simplest solution and the one that would cause the least confusion.
The majority of Taylor's colleagues disagreed.
On the House floor, State Rep. Charlie Geren, R-Fort Worth, argued that moving the Texas primary to April would ensure that the state would not be a factor in the 2012 presidential race. Others expressed concern that an April primary would move any possible runoffs into June, which would be a logistical challenge given that so many schools serve as polling places. Also, turning out voters in the summer would be tough.
Eight months later, something akin to Taylor's plan is looking like the best possible outcome.
At a hearing yesterday on Texas redistricting issues, the US Supreme Court put forth the very real possibility that this year's Texas primary may not be until late June in order to give federal courts more time to resolve issues regarding redistricting maps. Not only would that be a later date than anyone had foreseen last year, it would mean primary runoffs would take place in the middle of summer.
And a June primary isn't the strangest possible outcome of this scheduling fiasco.
In an email to party members this morning, Texas Republican Party Chair Steve Munisteri said that a split primary is looking more likely. Munisteri explained that the state conventions planned by the Texas Democratic and Republican parties are set for June and can't be rescheduled.
"There has to be a primary for at least some races by early April, in order to have the two parties' state conventions," Munisteri wrote. "Cancelling the state conventions is not an option for several reasons. First, the already incurred contractual obligations of the parties would jeopardize the financial health of both parties. Second, it is important that the State of Texas be able to pick delegates to the Republican National Convention so that we can have an impact on the Presidential race....Third, the Texas Election Code requires that we have a state convention. And fourth, we need to have elections for party officers, including State Chairman, Vice-Chairman, National Committeeman and Committeewoman, and the members of the State Republican Executive Committee."
Even if the primary is only delayed until May, instead of June, Munisteri explained that that still would not allow enough time for the Texas Republican Party to properly plan for its June state convention.
With few options left, hosting two Texas primaries may end up the only viable solution remaining.
-Aman Batheja