« Perry campaigner's handout portrays Hutchison as Obama ally on abortion | Main | Tyson says Texas evolution critics are a threat to economy »

February 17, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2cc953ef011278ebab6d28a4

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference State restaurant group backs statewide smoking ban:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Mark Durand Jr. Long Prairie, Minnesota

Looks like the Nazi's have taken over down there, too. And all this time i thought it was just the crazy liberals here in Minnesota.

These political goons know what's best for you, don't they?

Anti-business and anti-constitution is what they are. I expect this from the left but now the right sees the unbridled power they can have. The liberals have lready figured it out.

Saving you from yourselves!

TME

People just do not realize that it is just a foothold. It sets an extremely dangerous precedent.

Greg

It is about time the Texas Restaurant Association members wised up. Accommodating 20% of the population with their usually fatal habit to the detriment of 80% doesn't make wise economic sense.
I don't patronize any restaurant that allows the stench and health hazards of cigarette smoke. The stench hits you as soon as you open the door to a restaurant that allows smoking. When I tell the hostess why I'm leaving, they usually say the smoking section is separate. That is like having a separate peeing section in a swimming pool.
Restaurants that allow cigarette smoke don't give a damn about their employees or customers.

Now with the hodgepodge of scattered out city smoking bans, cities like Grapevine are loser magnets and clean cities like Southlake are stench free. It is embarrassing that so many states including Louisiana and Arkansas are ahead of Texas in passing a statewide smoking ban.

I moved to this area from College Station. I was there before and after a smoking ban was passed. Restaurant business increased substantially after the ban. Perhaps the change in economy in the last 13 plus months has more to do with Charlie Geren's drop in sales. That and possibly the remnants of years of disgusting stench impregnated into every porous surface.
He should move to a new building not ruined by smokers.

TES

Then you idiot stay out of places you know allow smoking. The Market WILL decide. How stupid can you be? Letting the government make choices for people, especially for a legal activity, is just the beginning of a slide down a slippery slope you WILL regret later.

It is about time the Texas Restaurant Association members wised up. Accommodating 20% of the population with their usually fatal habit to the detriment of 80% doesn't make wise economic sense.
I don't patronize any restaurant that allows the stench and health hazards of cigarette smoke. The stench hits you as soon as you open the door to a restaurant that allows smoking. When I tell the hostess why I'm leaving, they usually say the smoking section is separate. That is like having a separate peeing section in a swimming pool.
Restaurants that allow cigarette smoke don't give a damn about their employees or customers.

Now with the hodgepodge of scattered out city smoking bans, cities like Grapevine are loser magnets and clean cities like Southlake are stench free. It is embarrassing that so many states including Louisiana and Arkansas are ahead of Texas in passing a statewide smoking ban.

I moved to this area from College Station. I was there before and after a smoking ban was passed. Restaurant business increased substantially after the ban. Perhaps the change in economy in the last 13 plus months has more to do with Charlie Geren's drop in sales. That and possibly the remnants of years of disgusting stench impregnated into every porous surface.
He should move to a new building not ruined by smokers.

Johnnyb

Makes more sense to ban BBQ than to ban smoking, think about it! A BBQ joint burns through 100s of pounds of logs every day at any one location. Wood produces the same chemicals that cigarette smoke does, but it would take the entire city of Dallas chain smoking at one spot to equal the amount of smoke at one BBQ joint, and even then its doubtful that they could make as much smoke!

Natural gas produces the same chemicals that cigarette smoke does too, perhaps we should also ban gas ranges and gas heaters in all public establishments. Close down all the burger joints that are using gas, Burger King will certainly have to be shut down, after all the fumes coming off of cooking meat are carcinogenic, and Burger King is an attractive nusaince that markets directly to kids.

Alcohol should certainly be banned, because it has many of the same chemicals that cigarette smokes does, in some cases 1000s of times the dose. Not to mention that it gets people drunk, causes them to wreck their cars and kill people, is a leading cause of arrests and domestic violence. Ban Alcohol, its far worse the tobacco smoke!

Cars should be banned, they are producing the same carcinogenic chemicals as cigarette smoke and MORE. Everyone driving down I-35 Stemmons, is directly sucking in fumes from the cars in front of them. Same chemicals, just in much greater quantities.

Then after we get rid of the cars, the burger joints, the BBQ joints, and converted the entire State to run on wind and solar power to run all the heating/air conditioning, and electric stoves we can ban smoking and everyone will live forever, whether they want to or not.

One thing that I find alittle bit funny though, why is it that the heaviest smoking cultures like the Japanese, French and Greeks also have the longest lifespans on Earth? Maybe its because they do not have BBQ joints, I don't know.

e cigarette

This is either a really good idea... Or a really bad one.

John S

As far as restaurants bars and clubs are concerned, I think it is individual businesses that should be allowed to choose if they allow smoking or not, and there should be a provision given to businesses to make the transition so that both non-smoker and smoking customers can be accomodated. I myself have switched to an e-cig, so I dont have to worry about the bans, but I still sympathise with smoker's rights.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.